[Home Page] 
I wish to thank Christine, a Web site visitor turned friend, for contributing the first study questions to this site. I hope to offer questions on a variety of topics and individuals, but do not plan to ask me for the answers. Maybe an instructor will use these — I certainly believe they will help students learn about existentialism.
What is existentialism?
Which writers and thinkers embraced the label “existentialist” and which did not?
How is Camus’ absurdism different from that of Kafka?
Is Camus an existentialist?
How is Sisyphus an existential hero?
How does Hegel influence phenomenology and existentialism?
While criticizing religion at times, Heidegger’s writings border on theological mysticism. Did Heidegger recognize his mystical tone? Does it damage his scholarship?
Was Heidegger sorry for his role in the Third Reich? What were his regrets? For what did he never express regret?
Husserl’s phenomenology served as the basis for the works of Sartre and Heidegger. What does existentialism owe to phenomenology? How do the two differ?
What is the transcendental ego in Husserl’s philosophy?
How does Nietzsche’s classics education (philology) influence his philosophy?
How does Nietzsche define morality?
Sartre characterized human relationships as inescapably marked by conflict. Why is there a conflict? How is “The Look” related to “Being-for-Others” in Sartre’s writings?
What are the roles of masochism and sadism in Sartre’s works?
According to Sartre, why are humans drawn towards troubled relationships?
What is “nothingness” in Sartre’s works? How does the concept evolve throughout his career?
What wrong conception of being has “modern thought” overcome? By what dualism was that conception replaced?
How does bad faith differ from a lie? What difficulties follow from this difference? How does psychoanalysis address these difficulties? What are two reasons why the psychoanalytic approach does not work?
What does it mean to say: “Every belief is a belief that falls short; one never wholly believes what one believes”? How is this relevant to bad faith?
What are the inadequate conceptions of the past? What is the true relation I have with my past?
What is the present? What is presence?
What is the future? Why is it that the For-itself “can never be its Future except problematically”?
What is knowledge? What is solipsism?
Why is it that “danger is not an accident but the permanent structure of my being-for-others”?
How can we “explain that unshakable resistance which common sense has always opposed to the solipsistic argument”?
How does the fact that I can be mistaken in thinking that I am looked at “help us in our investigation”?
What is absence? What is it not?
What is fear? How can it be resolved?
What is shame? How is God relevant to it?
What is pride? Why is pride in bad faith?
[Home Page]
Mail comments and suggestions to: cswyatt@tameri.com
Last Updated:
Friday, 30-Apr-2004 12:45
This site copyright © 2000-2003 C. S. Wyatt